Eccox QC Modernization Guide

Eccox QC analyzes source code against a predefined set of rules to identify potential issues and enforce coding standards. It supports COBOL, DB2, CICS, and Java. The tool integrates with source code management systems like Serena Changeman ZMF and CA Endevor.

Eccox QC integrates with Serena Changeman ZMF, CA Endevor, Eclipse IDE, CruiseControl, Apache Continuum, Hudson CI, Rational Team Concert, Apache Ant, and Apache Maven. This allows for automated code quality checks within existing development workflows.

Eccox QC supports COBOL code, including DB2 and CICS statements. It also supports Java for non-mainframe systems, typically used with Apache Tomcat.

The tool produces a score based on predefined rules as code is compiled. This score reflects the code's adherence to the established coding standards and rules.

Eccox QC can be used through batch interfaces for automated processing and ISPF interfaces for interactive use. Configuration files define the rules and standards to be enforced.

While specific API details are not publicly available, integration with CI/CD tools like CruiseControl, Apache Continuum, and Hudson CI suggests the presence of APIs or command-line interfaces for automated code analysis.

The architecture likely includes components for parsing source code, evaluating rules, and generating reports. Specific component names are not available without direct access to the product documentation.

The tool likely uses a database or file system to store rules, configurations, and results. Specific database types are not publicly documented.

By enforcing coding standards and identifying potential defects early in the development cycle, Eccox QC helps reduce development costs, improve code quality, and minimize the risk of production issues.

The tool's integration with source code management systems and CI/CD pipelines enables automated code quality checks, ensuring consistent adherence to coding standards across all projects.

A higher code quality score translates to fewer defects, reduced maintenance costs, and improved application stability, leading to increased customer satisfaction.

While specific authentication methods are not publicly detailed, enterprise tools often support standard methods such as LDAP or Active Directory integration for user authentication.

The access control model is likely role-based access control (RBAC), allowing administrators to assign permissions to users based on their roles within the organization.

Audit logging capabilities likely exist to track user activity and changes to rules and configurations, providing an audit trail for compliance purposes.

Administrative interfaces are available through both batch and ISPF interfaces. The ISPF interface provides a GUI for interactive administration, while the batch interface allows for automated configuration and management.

User management is typically handled through the administrative interfaces, allowing administrators to add, modify, and delete user accounts and assign roles and permissions.

Monitoring and logging capabilities likely include the ability to track code analysis results, identify rule violations, and generate reports on code quality metrics.